Legal Opinion

420 Riverside Drive v. Ettinger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 29, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated June 26, 2002 affirmed, with $10 costs.

*108In these holdover proceedings consolidated for disposition below, landlord, a cooperative corporation, seeks to recover two cellar spaces leased to Thomas Ettinger, who is also the non-purchasing rent-controlled tenant of two joined eleventh-floor apartments in the building. Civil Court properly rejected tenant’s argument that the cellar spaces are subject to rent regulation because he used them as “ancillary living space” appurtenant to the rent-controlled apartments. The rooms at issue are designated as storage space on…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Chwatt AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. 129 East 56th Street Corp. v. HarrisonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. 110-15 71st Road Associates, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. McLaughlin v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McLaughlin v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API