Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceGallagher, Associate Judge
(concurring) .
As I see it, appellants’ principal contention is that the statutory scheme, D.C.Code 1967, §§ 45-901 through 908, creates a tenant’s right to 30 days’ notice to quit prior to the institution of proceedings for possession by his landlord, though concededly Section 45-908 authorizes an agreement between the parties to shorten the notice period or to waive it altogether. Appellants urge with considerable force that once the parties fail to agree on a waiver of the 30-day notice to quit requirement, all that remains of the statutory scheme is the tenant's right to such notice, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. A. T. Beaty, United States of America v. R. J. BarcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- H. L. Rust Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Pierce D. Leonard, D/B/A Emanuel County StockyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963