Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wilson v. John R. Pinkett, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1970No. 4878-4884Published

1ConcurrenceGallagher, Associate Judge

(concurring) .

As I see it, appellants’ principal contention is that the statutory scheme, D.C.Code 1967, §§ 45-901 through 908, creates a tenant’s right to 30 days’ notice to quit prior to the institution of proceedings for possession by his landlord, though concededly Section 45-908 authorizes an agreement between the parties to shorten the notice period or to waive it altogether. Appellants urge with considerable force that once the parties fail to agree on a waiver of the 30-day notice to quit requirement, all that remains of the statutory scheme is the tenant's right to such notice, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. A. T. Beaty, United States of America v. R. J. BarcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. H. L. Rust Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  4. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Pierce D. Leonard, D/B/A Emanuel County StockyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API