Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Tennessee Education Lottery Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 21, 2016No. 3:14-cv-1270PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Denise Armstrong brings claims against the Tennessee Education Lottery Corporation (the “Lottery Corporation”), alleging multiple federal and state law causes of action arising from termination of her employment. Before the Court is the Lottery Corporation’s motion for. summary judgment, (Doc. No. 23.) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED on Armstrong’s hostile work environment and retaliation claims and DENIED on her gender discrimination claim.
I. Factual Background
The Lottery Corporation is a public…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kazay v. Face & Body, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Ogbonna-McGruder v. Austin Peay State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Shallenberger v. CoreCivic - Trousdale Turner Correctional CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020