Legal Opinion
Crump & Field v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 17, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Tinsley
Reversing.
This appeal presents but one question; that is, whether a receiver’s expenses incurred in operating the business put into his hands should be charged against the plaintiffs in the action -when the fund in court is insufficient therefor.
On May 15, 1924, the appellant, Crump & Field, obtained a judgment against Elkhornseam Collieries. Company for the sum of $179.10. On September 16, 1924, it, together with the Elkhorn Wholesale Grocery Company, W. G. Andrews, George De Witt Shoe Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, B. F. Goodrich Rubber…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Frick v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowersock Mills & Power Co. v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Rosenbalm v. Commercial Bank of MiddlesboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
- Rapp Lumber Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Cerwin v. TaubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Ohio Valley Banking Trust Company v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.