Legal Opinion

People v. Saunders

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1970No. Docket 7,212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Leroy Saunders was tried and convicted by a jury of breaking and entering an office with intent to commit larceny. MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 28.305). He appeals as of right, alleging 1) that certain questioning of his alleged accomplices by the trial court denied him a fair trial, and 2) that the jury’s finding of an unlawful intent is not supported by the evidence. Neither of these allegations is of merit, and we affirm.

It is apparent from a reading of the trial transcript that the court’s questions were designed to clarify evasive and conflicting testimony and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. GollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HooperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Robert Louis Goldman v. Charles AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. People v. BowersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. ButlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. GrahlfsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API