Legal Opinion

State v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1977No. 7717SC297Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The defendant preserves six assignments of error in five arguments to the court. The arguments in appellant’s brief contain assignments of error which are misnumbered and three of the assignments of error are conclusory broadsides containing no legal issue, which we have repeatedly held to be inadequate to bring a question before this Court. Hudson v. Hudson, 21 N.C. App. 412, 204 S.E. 2d 697 (1974). In the exercise of our discretion, however, we have searched the record to discern defendant’s contentions as to error, and we conclude there was no prejudicial error.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. CaudleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API