United States v. Malitovsky Cooperage Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
The United States of America brought this action against Malitovsky Cooperage Company (Malitovsky) to recover a statutory penalty and damages on the grounds that oil which emanated from the defendant’s steel drum reconditioning plant had been discharged into the Allegheny River in violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 1321(b)(3). 1 The plaintiff sought damages in the amount of $51,884.19 plus interest, representing an administratively assessed penalty • of $5,000.00 2 and the actual costs of $46,884.19 incurred by plaintiff in removing the oil from the river. 3…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Cutten v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1972
- United States v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
- United States v. Healy Tibbitts Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kyoei Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd. v. M/V BERING TRADERDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1991
- United States v. Delian Cruises, SADistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.