Legal Opinion

United States v. Malitovsky Cooperage Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1979No. Civ. A. 75-748PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

The United States of America brought this action against Malitovsky Cooperage Company (Malitovsky) to recover a statutory penalty and damages on the grounds that oil which emanated from the defendant’s steel drum reconditioning plant had been discharged into the Allegheny River in violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 1321(b)(3). 1 The plaintiff sought damages in the amount of $51,884.19 plus interest, representing an administratively assessed penalty • of $5,000.00 2 and the actual costs of $46,884.19 incurred by plaintiff in removing the oil from the river. 3…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  4. Cutten v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1972
  5. United States v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  2. United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
  3. United States v. Healy Tibbitts Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Kyoei Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd. v. M/V BERING TRADERDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1991
  5. United States v. Delian Cruises, SADistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API