Legal Opinion
Greenough v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph Gerace, J.), entered October 24, 2003. The order granted the cross motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1).
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the cross motion of defendant Cassadaga Telephone Corporation in part and reinstating the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and the Labor Law § 241 (6)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piazza v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- DeFreece v. Penny Bag, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Girty v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gampietro v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Jurgens v. Whiteface Resort on Lake Placid, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wheeler v. Citizens Telecommunications Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- VANNAME, JESSE v. ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- VanName v. Rochester Gas & Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- VanName v. Rochester Gas & Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013