Legal Opinion
Glassman v. Hamel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 15, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for the death and conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s brother, and his intestate, Zelig G-lassman. The case is here on the plaintiff’s exception to the trial judge’s direction of a verdict for the defendants. The evidence is summarized in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff.
Zelig was employed as a freight elevator operator by a shoe company. The company was tenant, under an oral agreement made in 1952, of one half of the second floor and of all of the third to seventh floors, inclusive, of the defendants’ Haverhill factory building. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Banaghan v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Mucha v. Northeastern Crushed Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Ryerson v. Fall River Philanthropic Burial SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- McCarthy v. Isenberg Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Story v. Lyon Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'Brien v. ChristensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Cohen v. Suburban Sidney-Hill, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Schopen v. RandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Campbell v. LeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Fallstrom v. Brady Electrical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.