Legal Opinion

Baker v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 13, 1969No. 5-4984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This is an original petition for a Writ of Mandamus to compel the respondent to set petitioner’s case for trial at the earliest available date and thereby correct respondent’s alleged abuse of discretion in ordering a continuance.

In granting a continuance, the trial court found, after consideration of the motion, the record, argument and statement of counsel, that the petitioner had sued the defendant, Heath & Scarbrough, and other parties in a Federal District Court of Tennessee; that the cause in that court against the defendant was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Edmondson v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Thompson v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Toney v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Tyson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Toney v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API