Baker v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This is an original petition for a Writ of Mandamus to compel the respondent to set petitioner’s case for trial at the earliest available date and thereby correct respondent’s alleged abuse of discretion in ordering a continuance.
In granting a continuance, the trial court found, after consideration of the motion, the record, argument and statement of counsel, that the petitioner had sued the defendant, Heath & Scarbrough, and other parties in a Federal District Court of Tennessee; that the cause in that court against the defendant was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Edmondson v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Thompson v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carter v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Toney v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Tyson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Toney v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990