Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Stahl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered March 12, 1993, which, insofar as is pertinent to the appeal as limited by appellant’s reply brief, granted plaintiffs motion to disqualify the law firm of Shea & Gould as attorneys for defendant-appellant, with related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Disqualification of counsel rests in the sound discretion of the court, and here there has been no showing of abuse (see, Schmidt v Magnetic Head Corp., 101 AD2d 268, 277). It cannot be said that the past matters and the instant matter are "completely unrelated”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Macro Cash & Carry Corp. v. BerkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Avalon L. L. C. v. Coronet Properties Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Decana Inc. v. ContogourisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Neighborhood Supermarket Chain, Inc. v. Epic Security Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API