Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hamilton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1941No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant William Hamilton was the president of a social club duly licensed to sell alcoholic beverages to its members. He with the other defendants, employees of the club, were charged in three indictments with the illegal sale of liquor to non-members of the club. The bills were consolidated and were tried together. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case a demurrer to the evidence was sustained as to all defendants except defendant Hamilton, on bill 240, and as to all defendants except James O’Neill on bill No. 241, and as to all defendants on bill No. 242. The jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Chestnut Street Trust & Saving Fund Co. v. Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. VernilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. EberhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. SummonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. YapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API