Legal Opinion

Ex parte Whitley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

• Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court, Northern District; Eugene Lankford, Judge;

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Curiam.

The petitioner was, it appears, convicted below of a felony, and prayed an- appeal to this court, and was given time to prepare a bill of exceptions. The oral proceedings were taken down by the court stenographer, and petitioner alleges that that officer refused to furinsh a transcript of the proceedings. He apples to us now for a rule on the stenographer to compel him to furnish a transcript of the proceedings so that the same may be incorporated in the bill -of exceptions.

This court has no power to grant any such relief. It has power to compel the clerk of the trial court to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BarstowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Thom v. Wilson'sIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wirges v. BeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Sutton v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API