Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

E. S. Barnard was indicted for the murder of Dr. Herman Poff, and upon his trial was convicted of murder in the second degree.

*616It is insisted for the Commonwealth that the judgment must be affirmed because there are no proper bills of exception. These bills are subject to criticism, for unquestionably the better practice is for the trial judge so to identify the evidence and the instructions to which the bills relate as to make it impossible to question such identification.

In this case the evidence is stated by the trial judge to be “here filed and identified by the stamp thereon, ‘Archie P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Ratcliffe v. McDonald's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Bailey v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  4. Adams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API