Lott v. DOUGLAS OIL PURCHASING CO., INC.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
In their complaint, plaintiffs sought a judgment declaring that the lease between plaintiffs and defendants had effectively been extended by the acts of the parties. After a jury trial, the trial court entered a directed verdict for plaintiffs/lessees, declaring that the lease "was effectively extended for an additional ten-year term following the expiration of the primary term on December 14, 1983, and is in full force and effect." The lessors' primary arguments against this judgment are that they did not waive the lease's requirement of written notice of extension and that the lease's…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Costarides v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ryan v. AcuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Probst v. . Rochester Steam Laundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Holton v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- BoWing Office Systems, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- Rehoboth Mall Ltd. Partnership v. NPC International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Womack v. HycheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- HOUSING AUTH. OF BIRMINGHAM DIST. v. DurrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Cahaba Forests, LLC v. HayDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.