Legal Opinion

In Re: Tsarnaev v.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 3, 2015No. 14-2362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

We have carefully reviewed petitioner’s application for a writ of mandamus. Even assuming that the. district court’s order denying petitioner’s second motion for change of venue would be subject to review by mandamus, see In re Kouri-Perez, 134 F.3d 361 (1st Cir.1998) (unpublished per curiam), we deny the petition and hold only that petitioner has not made the extraordinary showing required to justify mandamus relief. See In re Bulger, 710 F.3d 42, 45 (1st Cir.2013) (before mandamus will issue, petitioner must satisfy burden of showing right to issuance of writ is clear and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. In Re: Bulger v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. McVeighDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1996
  4. United States v. AwadallahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re: Tsarnaev v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. TsarnaevCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. In Re: Tsarnaev v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. In Re: Tsarnaev v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Pataud v. USCIS Boston Field OfficeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API