Legal Opinion

Hodgkin v. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to set aside an order.

1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.

—The question presented is whether subdivision 7 of section 401 of the Code, enacted in 1862, is broad enough to cover the case of a party to an action, whose affidavit, for the purposes of a motion, is required by his adversary. Section 389 specifically provides that no examination of a party, at the instance of the adverse party, shall be had, except in the manner prescribed in chapter 6 of title 12. That chapter only permits such an examination before or at the trial, or conditionally or up*74on commission, and clearly for the sole purpose of obtaining testimony to be used upon the actual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Dusenbury & OgdenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  2. Huelin v. RidnerNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Palmer v. AdamsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1862

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coulter v. MurrayNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API