Legal Opinion
GPI at Danville Crossing, L.P. v. West Central Conservancy District
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2007No. 32A01-0609-CV-395PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
GPI at Danville Crossing, L.P. (“GPI”), appeals from the trial court’s entry of sum mary judgment in favor of West Central Conservancy District (“the District”) on GPI’s claim for injunctive relief. GPI presents two issues for our review:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded that the District’s classification of GPI as a “residential user” was not arbitrary and capricious.
2. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded, in effect, that the District’s method of calculating penalties was not contrary to law.
We affirm in part, reverse in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Indiana Civil Rights Com'n v. INIIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Borsuk v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Zawistoski v. Gene B. Glick Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryan v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Whiteside v. Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Paternity of G.G.B.W. v. S.W.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Yankee Park Homeowners Ass'n v. LaGrange County Sewer DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- First Financial Bank, National Assn., Hamilton, Ohio, as Successor in Interest to Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., Receiver of Irwin Union Bank and Trust Co. v. Fred L. Paris and Michelle S. ParisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.