Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Pagedale v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1992No. 59316Published

1DissentKarohl, Judge

The majority opinion holds the judgment entered is defective by finding defendants are in violation of a July 5, 1989, order which was not referenced in the motion for contempt or order to show cause. The enforcement order also incorporates the July 5, 1989, order. Thus, a new enforcement order must be considered and entered if appropriate. With this I concur. I must respectfully dissent, however, from the court’s ruling the pleadings were sufficient to support a judgment against John Taylor individually. The order to show cause and attached motion for contempt do not fully and fairly inform…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. BronskaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Carter County R-1 School District v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State ex rel. O'Brien v. MorelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Kohlleppel v. OwensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API