Legal Opinion

Heirs of Ledoux v. Lavedan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1900No. 12,987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans. Thearclj J.

1Opinion of the Court

*313In original opinion Mu. Justice Rlaxchard concurs in the decree; Nicholls, G. J., recuses himself, having been of counsel in the original litigation; Moxroe, J., takes no part, not having been a member of the court when the case was submitted.

On the rehearing ithe opinion of the court was delivered by ifONROE, J.

(Breaux, J., and BlaNCiiard, J., concurring in the decree on the ground of the prescription pleaded; Nioholls, O. J., recused).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WatiíiNS, J.

In the case of same title, No. 12,383, 49th Anji., 913, the issues which we are to decide in the instant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Chaffraix v. ShiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Buillard v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Cook v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Delouche v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  4. Bradford-Kennedy Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Pitre v. PeltierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API