Legal Opinion

International Silver Co. v. Roger Chromeware, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 23, 1964No. Civ. No. 64 C 840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from using the name “Roger” allegedly infringing plaintiff’s mark Rogers.

It appears that the following inscription was stamped on the backs of defendants articles:

“ROGER CHROMEWARE INC BY SIL-VARWARE CO.”

No principal or employee of the defendants was born with the name “Roger”. The individual defendants derived the name by combining some of the letters of their names.

The plaintiff claims that the use of the mark “Roger” by the defendants will tend to confuse the public in believing that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  2. Santa's Workshop, Inc. v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Santa's Workshop, Inc. v. SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Lincoln Restaurant Corp. v. Wolfies Rest., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sutton Cosmetics (P. R.) Inc. v. Lander Co., Inc., Scott Chemical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. WSM, Inc. v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1969
  3. Sutton Cosmetics (P. R.) Inc. v. Lander Co., Inc., Scott Chemical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API