Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Corps of Engineers of United States Army
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1978No. 78-1712PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff originally filed her complaint in the district court alleging that she was removed from her employment with the Corps of Engineers because of age and race discrimination in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. The district court allowed her to proceed below in forma pauperis. After a plenary hearing the court found “that plaintiff’s charges of racial and age discrimination are unsubstantiated by the evidence,” and entered judgment in favor of the defendant, each party to pay its own costs. Plaintiff’s counsel then moved to be relieved as counsel for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Maloney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Norvin G. Maloney, Jr. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Beatrice Jaffe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eddie Evans v. City of Tulsa, a Municipality Paul Payne, Jointly and IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Rhodes v. Corps Of Engineers Of The United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978