Legal Opinion
Dorsey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1949No. 12294PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Tharp, Howard, Dorsey and Webb were indicted in Count 1 for a conspiracy to violate General Ration Order No. 8 and Third Revised Ration Order No. 3 made under the Second War Powers Act, 50 U. S.C.A.Appendix, § 631 et seq., with respect to rationed sugar; and in Counts 2 and 3 Tharp was charged with substantive offenses with reference to rationed sugar documents ; and in Counts 4 and 5 Howard was charged with similar substantive offenses. Howard pleaded guilty to Counts 4 and 5 and was not tried on Count 1. The other defendants were convicted and sentenced on Count 1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Robert George Moll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Edward Robelto IbleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Casso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.