Legal Opinion

Demeter v. Demeter

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 4, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this action for equitable relief brought in a Probate Court, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant, her former husband, fraudulently deprived her of her interest in the marital home by falsely representing to her that the property was going to be foreclosed due to his inability to make mortgage payments. The judge concluded that the conduct of the defendant did not constitute fraud upon the plaintiff. We disagree.

In reviewing a trial judge’s conclusions, it is our duty to draw our own inferences and reach our own conclusions from the judge’s subsidiary findings, which will not be set…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Snyder v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Powell v. RasmussenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Licker v. GluskinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Levy v. BendetsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirtz v. KirtzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. Giner v. GinerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Demeter v. DemeterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Roche v. RocheMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Roche v. RocheMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API