Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pagels

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 26, 2007No. 05-P-1435PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.

A Superior Court jury found the defendant, Stephen D. Pagels, guilty of assault and battery in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 13A, and of intimidation of a witness in violation of G. L. c. 268, § 13B, as amended through St. 1996, c. 393, §§ 2-4. They acquitted him of assault with intent to murder. On appeal the defendant argues (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction of intimidating a witness; (2) that the judge should have allowed his motion for a new trial upon both convictions because the defendant’s attorney provided ineffective assistance in multiple instances; and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CarvalhoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. DeschaineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. VitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. AriasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API