Legal Opinion

Lanoue v. Reed

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This suit was instituted against John Reed, testamentary executor of Mrs. Sarah Rowell, deceased, for the rescission of the sale of three slaves, which the plaintiff purchased at the sale of the succession of Mrs. Rowell. The plaintiff prays, that the executor and Mrs. Mary Pierce, wife of Constantius Pierce, assisted by her husband, be cited &c.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This suit was instituted against John Reed, testamentary executor of Mrs. Sarah Rowell, deceased, for the rescission of the sale of three slaves, which the plaintiff purchased at the sale of the succession of Mrs. Rowell. The plaintiff prays, that the executor and Mrs. Mary Pierce, wife of Constantius Pierce, assisted by her husband, be cited &c. The citation in the District Court, was issued and directed to the executor, and Mrs. Mary Pierce, wife, fyc. On the trial, the defendant had judgment, and the…

1Opinion of the CourtMathews, J.

The appellees move to dismiss this appeal, on the ground of want of legal citation.

The suit is brought against an executor, and a testamentary heir; the latter being a married woman, was sued together with her husband. He is not cited in the appeal, which ought to have been done, being a party to the suit, necessarily made so, to protect the interest of his wife.

It is, therefore, ordered, that the appeal be dismissed, at the cost of the appellant.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sicard v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Giroir v. DumesnilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API