Meader v. Malcolm
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court. — IIon. H. Y. B. Hill, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
This is an action on a promissory note for $500; and the petition, which is in usual form, alleges the execution and delivery of the note by defendants as partners under the firm name of Demuth & Malcolm.
Defendant Demuth made default, and defendant Malcolm answered, denying the execution of the- note in suit ' in the firm name of Demuth & Malcolm, admitting defendants were, on the 8th day of June, 1878, a firm doing business in Rolla, Missouri, under the firm name of Demuth & Malcolm, and pleading that the note in suit was executed by Demuth in the firm name, in fraud of the rights of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henslee v. CannefaxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Farmers' Bank of Missouri v. BaylessSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
3Cited by8 opinions
- Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Roden v. HelmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Monmouth College v. DockerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Howe v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Stewart v. American Exchange National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.