Legal Opinion

Hoenig v. Mason & Hanger, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1968No. 52985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

From district court’s affirmance of order by industrial commissioner dismissing claimant’s workmen’s compensation arbitration petition, she appeals. We affirm.

December 7, 1966, claimant filed a petition for arbitration, first generally invoking chapter 86, Code of Iowa, 1962, followed by these allegations:

“1. That the MASON & HANGER COMPANY is a corporation operating under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Iowa and engaged in the business of manufacturing at Burlington, in Des Moines County, Iowa, and was operating under and within the Iowa Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Barton v. Nevada Poultry CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Cross v. Hermanson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Yeager v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Iron Workers Local No. 67 v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. McDowell v. Town of ClarksvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. MC Holdings, L.L.C. Vs. Davis County Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API