Padron v. Padron
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
We granted Ernesto Padron’s application for discretionary review to consider the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint for divorce due to a perceived jurisdictional infirmity. After reviewing the record, we conclude the trial court erred. Therefore, we reverse.
Appellant filed a verified complaint for divorce in which he asserted he was a resident of Georgia and had been for more than six months prior to the filing of the complaint. OCGA § 19-5-2 prohibits a court from granting a divorce “to any person who has not been a bona fide resident of this state for six months before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bustamante v. BustamanteUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Matter of Marriage of PirouzkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Abou-Issa v. Abou-IssaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- In the Interest of M. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- A.Z. v. Higher Education Student Assistance AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- In Re the Marriage of quijada/dominguezArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- In the Interest Of: M. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016