Legal Opinion

Padron v. Padron

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 2007No. S06A1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

We granted Ernesto Padron’s application for discretionary review to consider the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint for divorce due to a perceived jurisdictional infirmity. After reviewing the record, we conclude the trial court erred. Therefore, we reverse.

Appellant filed a verified complaint for divorce in which he asserted he was a resident of Georgia and had been for more than six months prior to the filing of the complaint. OCGA § 19-5-2 prohibits a court from granting a divorce “to any person who has not been a bona fide resident of this state for six months before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Bustamante v. BustamanteUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Matter of Marriage of PirouzkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Abou-Issa v. Abou-IssaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. In the Interest of M. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. A.Z. v. Higher Education Student Assistance AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  4. In Re the Marriage of quijada/dominguezArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  5. In the Interest Of: M. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API