Legal Opinion

Vacuum Systems, Inc. v. Bridge Construction Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 26, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Vacuum Systems, Inc., (“VSI”) appeals from the entry of a summary judgment in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) in favor of The Bridge Construction Company (“Bridge”) and Aetna Life & Casualty Company (“Aetna”) holding that VSI’s action seeking recovery on a payment bond for labor and materials expended as a subcontractor was time-barred because VSI failed to commence its action within one year as required by the statute of limitations. 14 M.R.S.A. §■ 871 (1980). On appeal, VSI contends that the record generates a material issue of fact whether Bridge and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milliken v. BuswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Townsend v. AppelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Hanusek v. Southern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Dugan v. MartelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Jack v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dasha Ex Rel. Dasha v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Nuccio v. NuccioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Nuccio v. NuccioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Town of Union v. StrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Hooper Ex Rel. Estate of Clinton v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API