Legal Opinion

Bucklew v. Precythe

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2018No. : 17-3052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant Bucklew's petition for rehearing by panel is denied. Judge Colloton would grant the petition for rehearing by panel.

Appellant Bucklew's petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and the petition is denied. Chief Judge Smith and Judge Kelly would grant the petition. Judge Colloton and Judge Gruender would grant rehearing en banc *528on Point I of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Judge Duane Benton took no part in the consideration or decision of the petition for rehearing en banc.

2DissentKelly, Circuit Judge

I would grant Russell Bucklew's petition for rehearing en banc-and reverse the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Dunn v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Russell Bucklew v. George LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Russell Bucklew v. Anne PrecytheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. Madison v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API