Legal Opinion
Computune, Inc. v. Tocio
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 30, 1998No. 95-P-1097PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The plaintiff, Computune, Inc. (Computune), brought a complaint in the Superior Court against the defendants, Edward D. Tocio and Dorothy P. Tocio (referred to collectively as “Tocio”), seeking specific performance of a lease, which included a provision for an option to purchase land, and money damages. Tocio, in turn, filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration that (1) the lease was not in effect when Computune attempted to exercise its option to purchase, and (2) the lease had expired on September 15, 1988, relegating Computune to a tenant at will status as of that date. The matter was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Trustees of the Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Loitherstein v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Gerson Realty Inc. v. CasalyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Cadillac Automobile Co. v. StoutMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Police Commissioner v. RobinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- McMann v. McGowanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Fenoglio v. Augat, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- T.W. Nickerson, Inc. v. Fleet National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- M.J. Realty Trust II v. DinnocenzoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.