Legal Opinion

Scriven v. Hursh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Isabella. Injunction against foreclosure sale. The petition was dismissed and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Complainant filed his bill to foreclose a mortgage. Subpoena was personally served upon both defendants. They did not appear, and a decree was rendered in favor of complainant, and the mortgaged premises advertised to be sold on the 16th day of November, 1877.

*99November 14th, defendants presented their petition in the court and cause, in which they attempted to excuse their not appearing and defending, and asking that the decree be vacated and they have leave to file their joint and several answer nunc pro tunc, and for farther relief. The court dismissed the petition, and from the order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Heegaard v. Dakota Loan & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Mickle v. MaxfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Northwestern Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. BoothUtah Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API