Legal Opinion

People v. Rosa

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1935No. Crim. 323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendants were jointly charged with the crime of rape and, in a second count of the information, with the crime of kidnaping. A jury convicted the defendant Saucedo on both counts and convicted the defendant Rosa of the crime of rape. Judgments were entered and this appeal followed.

The main contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdicts. While it is conceded, as it must be, that the story told by the prosecuting witness is sufficient, if believed, to support the verdicts it. is contended that her testimony is so inconsistent, unreasonable and improbable as to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. BroylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API