Legal Opinion

In re Babinski

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 25, 1999No. 98SA457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The parties in this lawyer discipline case entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. In the conditional admission, the respondent, David Paul Babinski, consented to disbarment. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

David Paul Babinski was licensed to practice law in this state in 1986. The conditional admission details Babinski’s misconduct in nine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. BabinskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HotleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API