City of Danville v. Clark
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp
Defendant, a minor aged 15 years, appeals from his conviction for disorderly conduct in violation of a municipal ordinance with assessment of a fine in the sum of $25 and $5 in costs. This court granted leave to appeal as a poor person.
From the record is appears that defendant filed a written request for appointment of counsel. Such was denied as being not timely and for the reason that “[i]t is not the custom of the court to appoint a free attorney in ordinance violation cases where no imprisonment is involved and only a fine can be imposed.” The record also shows defendant’s statements…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Danville v. HartshornIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Skaggs v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Haskell v. PerkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Bellchambers v. EbelingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Blincoe v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Danville v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976