Legal Opinion

City of Danville v. Clark

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 24, 1975No. 12406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Defendant, a minor aged 15 years, appeals from his conviction for disorderly conduct in violation of a municipal ordinance with assessment of a fine in the sum of $25 and $5 in costs. This court granted leave to appeal as a poor person.

From the record is appears that defendant filed a written request for appointment of counsel. Such was denied as being not timely and for the reason that “[i]t is not the custom of the court to appoint a free attorney in ordinance violation cases where no imprisonment is involved and only a fine can be imposed.” The record also shows defendant’s statements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Danville v. HartshornIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Skaggs v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Haskell v. PerkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Bellchambers v. EbelingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Blincoe v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Danville v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API