Wyland v. Mendel
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Shelby District Court. — Hon. A. B. Ti-iornell, Judge. Action in chancery to quiet in plaintiffs the title to certain town lots. There was a decree for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The plaintiffs file an amended abstract, the correctness of which is denied by defendants. The issue thus raised we need not determine, as we reach the conclusion that, upon the facts as disclosed by the original abstract, the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.
I. The petition alleges that plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the real estate in controversy, and prays that the title be quieted in them. The defendants answered the petition, denying plaintiffs’ title, and alleging that the title is in .another, under whom one of defendants holds possession as a tenant. Other matters…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lees v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Miller v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Davis v. NiemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Exchange National Bank v. McCafferySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Utley v. BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Coulthard v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.