Legal Opinion

Traylor v. City of Amarillo, Texas

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 26, 1971No. Civ. A. 2-1114, 2-1128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WOODWARD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in the above cases filed their respective complaints against the City of Amarillo, its mayor, its city manager and the members of its city commission, alleging causes of action under Title 42, U.S.Code, §§ 1983 and 1985. They each complain that defendants acting under color of certain city ordinances, known as Chapter 5, §§ 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, and 5-9, destroyed private property belonging to each of them and located in the City of Amarillo, and that such action was taken without just compensation, judicial determination, or due…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Santo Trafficante, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. City of Amarillo v. BettsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,120 Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Schmidt v. Pine Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ross v. DejarnettiDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API