Legal Opinion

United States v. One De Soto Sedan, 1946 Model, Etc., Robert Lee Smith, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1950No. 6028_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This case cannot be distinguished from Coffey v. United States, 116 U.S. 436, 6 S.Ct. 437, 29 L.Ed. 684; and the judgment below will be affirmed on the authority of that decision. 85 F.Supp. 245. It is argued that subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court have weakened the authority of the Coffey case; but that case has never been overruled. On the contrary, in one of the cases chiefly relied upon by the United States, the Supreme Court was at pains to distinguish it. See Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 58 S.Ct. 630, 82 L.Ed. 917.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. ONE DE SOTO SEDAN, 1946 MODEL, ETC.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Howell F. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. United States v. GramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Henry Grady Snead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. One 1956 Ford Fairlane Tudor Sedan, Motor No. M6et100140Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API