Legal Opinion
Woznick v. Santora
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants James Chingos and Margaret Chingos appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), entered September 17, 1990, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint and the cross claims against them as was based on the allegation that their shrubbery exceeded the height permitted by Smithtown Building Zone Ordinance § 54-10 (E).
*693Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferrer v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Somersall v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Grandone v. CosentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Shaw v. KullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sorrentino v. WildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Reuter v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- McSweeney v. RoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Deutcsh v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Perlak v. SollinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.