Legal Opinion

West v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1925Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing. After the foregoing opinion was filed, the defendant moved for a rehearing upon the order limiting the scope of a new trial.

Peaslee, C. J.

(The rule that a retrial for the correction of errors should be limited to that part of the case which might have been affected by the error, is subject to the qualification that as much more of the case must be retried as may be necessary in order to afford the parties a fair trial. The question what issues may have been affected by the error is usually one of law. It is properly dealt with in this court in the first instance. If not so…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doody v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Piper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
  3. McBride v. HuckinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  4. Genest v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  5. Piper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API