Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Reynolds v. Common Council

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to amend judgment by directing the payment of the costs to the attorney of record of the original relator.

1Opinion of the Court

Titus, Ch. J.

This motion is brought before me on an order to show cause why the judgment entered herein should not be amended by directing the payment of the costs therein to Daniel McIntosh, instead of the relators. The taxable costs in this case accrued in proceedings instituted by Amelia E. Reynolds to compel the defendant to pay her the amount of an award for damages sustained by her property in opening Elmwood avenue.

Daniel McIntosh, a counselor of this court, was the attorney for Mrs. Reynolds in the various proceedings therein had, and Mr. O. O. Cottle was her counsel. After the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Matter of Application of Mary E. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guliano v. WhitenackNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  2. Adams v. Niagara Cycle Fittings Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kult v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API