United States v. Knowlton Danderine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Philippi.’
1Opinion of the Court
GOFF, Circuit Judge.
The opinion of the court below, which contains a full statement of the facts, is found in 170 Fed. 449. Appellant assigns as error, in substance, that the court below erred in holding that the 65 casks of liquid extracts were not prepared, used, or shipped in any manner contrary to the laws of the United States, and that the United States had no right through its officers to seize the said casks or any of them. Under the facts disclosed by the record, we conclude that the court below properly found that, even if there was probable cause for making the seizure and filing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Sixty-Five Casks Liquid ExtractsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arner Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Strong, Cobb & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939