Indseth v. Pierce
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, District Judge.
I find the following facts:
I. Pierce. Simmons & Co., bankers at Red Wing, on February 1, 1877, for value received, sold to the agent of the plaintiff a foreign bill of exchange of that date in the words following, viz.:
J. C. Pierce. T. K. Simmons. A. W. Pratt.
Pierce, Simmons & Co., Bankers.
Red Wing, Minn., Feb. 1, 1877.
Exchange for 15,441.50 kr.
At sight of this original of exchange (duplicate unpaid) pay to the order of O. A. Ind-seth fifteen thousand four hundred and forty-one 50-100 kroner, value received, and charge same to account of Sk-P., I. & Co., Chicago, as per…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Halliday v. McDougallNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Frith v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. PotterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1879