Legal Opinion

Indseth v. Pierce

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1879No. Case No. 7,026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, District Judge.

I find the following facts:

I. Pierce. Simmons & Co., bankers at Red Wing, on February 1, 1877, for value received, sold to the agent of the plaintiff a foreign bill of exchange of that date in the words following, viz.:

J. C. Pierce. T. K. Simmons. A. W. Pratt.

Pierce, Simmons & Co., Bankers.

Red Wing, Minn., Feb. 1, 1877.

Exchange for 15,441.50 kr.

At sight of this original of exchange (duplicate unpaid) pay to the order of O. A. Ind-seth fifteen thousand four hundred and forty-one 50-100 kroner, value received, and charge same to account of Sk-P., I. & Co., Chicago, as per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Halliday v. McDougallNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Frith v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PotterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API