Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 14, 1993No. 92-2603PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
John F. Barnes, Terry Young, Erik Brynildson, Mark Koeppl, Lu Kummerow, and the Fund for Animals (Barnes) appeal from a circuit court judgment affirming the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) decision to refuse to add the bobcat to Wisconsin's list of threatened species under sec. 29.415, Stats., the Wisconsin endangered and threatened species statute. Barnes contends that the DNR erred in not choosing to list the bobcat as a threatened species because: (1) the continued existence of the bobcat in Wisconsin is "in jeopardy" under the correct interpretation of sec. 29.415; (2) the DNR's…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J.A.L. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Richland School District v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SeigelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- City of La Crosse v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Combined Investigative Services, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hilton Ex Rel. Pages Homeowners' Ass'n v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Sterlingworth Condominium Ass'n v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Sea View Estates Beach Club, Inc. v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.