Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Deseret Irrigation Co. v. Bishop

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. 5837Published

1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice

I concur, but shall state my own reasons for so doing. The answer of Grant H. Bishop alleges, among other matters, that the county took auditor’s deed on March 25, 1981, and that after the county took said deed, the commissioners “did on the 25th day of March, 1931, after giving statutory notice, offer for sale at the front door of the County Courthouse at Fillmore, Utah, the said land,” etc. Counsel for plaintiff, by stipulation, admitted all of the allegations of the answer up to and including the above-quoted portion. Counsel, I think, did not mean to question the regularity or validity of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanson v. BurrisUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hadlock v. Benjamin Drainage Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fisher v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Croft v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Utah Lead Co. v. Piute CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API