Legal Opinion

Reimann v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 10, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

This is a suit for recovery of sales taxes paid on extended warranty contracts for mo*136tor vehicles. In Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. Cardwell, 829 S.W.2d 132 (Tenn.1992), our Supreme Court held that such extended warranty contracts were not subject to sales tax under T.C.A. § 67-6-102(22)(F)(iv) and (vi) (1983 & Supp.1987).1

Plaintiffs, Lars M. Reimann and Woodson Tenent Laboratories, Inc., individually and on behalf of a class of persons and entities similarly situated, brought suit to recover amounts paid as sales taxes in connection with the purchase of extended warranty…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lyons v. LayTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Sam Carey Lumber Co. v. Sixty-One Cabinet Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Barry W. Ritchie v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  5. Porter Freeman v. Robert Ring, County Executive, Jerry Sharber, Mayor, - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API