Reimann v. Huddleston
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge.
This is a suit for recovery of sales taxes paid on extended warranty contracts for mo*136tor vehicles. In Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. Cardwell, 829 S.W.2d 132 (Tenn.1992), our Supreme Court held that such extended warranty contracts were not subject to sales tax under T.C.A. § 67-6-102(22)(F)(iv) and (vi) (1983 & Supp.1987).1
Plaintiffs, Lars M. Reimann and Woodson Tenent Laboratories, Inc., individually and on behalf of a class of persons and entities similarly situated, brought suit to recover amounts paid as sales taxes in connection with the purchase of extended warranty…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Covington Pike Toyota, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Beare Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- Lyons v. LayTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Sam Carey Lumber Co. v. Sixty-One Cabinet Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Barry W. Ritchie v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Porter Freeman v. Robert Ring, County Executive, Jerry Sharber, Mayor, - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.