Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Anderson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
This case arises from a slip and fall at a Publix grocery store. During discovery, the plaintiff sought “any and all reports concerning the incident identified in the plaintiffs complaint.” Publix asserted a work-product privilege and its privilege log identified two documents: a report of the incident by the assistant store manager and a “customer incident witness statement” of a customer service staff associate. Both items were prepared after the plaintiffs fall, on the same day. After reviewing the reports in camera, the trial court ordered their production. Publix seeks certiorari review…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. NakutisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marshalls of M.A., Inc. v. WitterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Millard Mall Services, Inc. v. BoldaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- International House of Pancakes v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Millard Mall Services, Inc. v. BoldaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Millard Services, Inc., etc. and Sunrise Mills (MLP) Limited Partnership, etc. v. Mary BoldaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.