Legal Opinion

Cirincione v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided April 29, 1966No. Claim No. 44859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDorothea E. Donaldson, J.

The State of New York moves to dismiss this claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 2, 7). The motion is timely made.

The claimant intestate’s vehicle was struck by another vehicle while traveling on the Tarrytown Road Bridge of the Saw Mill River Parkway, a part of the Westchester County parkway system. This system and the Taconic State Parkway system are under the operation and control of the East Hudson Parkway Authority (Public Authorities Law, § 450 et seq.). The powers given to this Authority are tantamount to a delegation of governmental function and manifests an intent by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pantess v. Saratoga Springs AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Strang v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santana v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Flynn v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Moroney v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API