Legal Opinion

Metzger v. Baker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 2, 1933No. 12,823PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred t'o as plaintiffs and defendant in error as defendant.

Plaintiffs bought a Denver drug store of defendant, and one Phipps, for $10,000. They brought this suit for $5,000 damages which they alleged they had sustained by reason of false representations made to them in that sale. Phipps was not served and the cause went to trial against defendant alone. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the court sustained defendant’s motion for non-suit and entered judgment accordingly. To review that judgment plaintiffs prosecute this writ.

The answer contained a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fish v. ClelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Nelson v. Van Schaack & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Chacon v. ScavoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Emily v. BayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Seal v. HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Kunz v. WarrenColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API